Termination w.r.t. Q of the following Term Rewriting System could not be shown:
Q restricted rewrite system:
The TRS R consists of the following rules:
from1(X) -> cons2(X, from1(s1(X)))
length1(nil) -> 0
length1(cons2(X, Y)) -> s1(length11(Y))
length11(X) -> length1(X)
Q is empty.
↳ QTRS
↳ Non-Overlap Check
Q restricted rewrite system:
The TRS R consists of the following rules:
from1(X) -> cons2(X, from1(s1(X)))
length1(nil) -> 0
length1(cons2(X, Y)) -> s1(length11(Y))
length11(X) -> length1(X)
Q is empty.
The TRS is non-overlapping. Hence, we can switch to innermost.
↳ QTRS
↳ Non-Overlap Check
↳ QTRS
↳ DependencyPairsProof
Q restricted rewrite system:
The TRS R consists of the following rules:
from1(X) -> cons2(X, from1(s1(X)))
length1(nil) -> 0
length1(cons2(X, Y)) -> s1(length11(Y))
length11(X) -> length1(X)
The set Q consists of the following terms:
from1(x0)
length1(nil)
length1(cons2(x0, x1))
length11(x0)
Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:
LENGTH1(cons2(X, Y)) -> LENGTH11(Y)
LENGTH11(X) -> LENGTH1(X)
FROM1(X) -> FROM1(s1(X))
The TRS R consists of the following rules:
from1(X) -> cons2(X, from1(s1(X)))
length1(nil) -> 0
length1(cons2(X, Y)) -> s1(length11(Y))
length11(X) -> length1(X)
The set Q consists of the following terms:
from1(x0)
length1(nil)
length1(cons2(x0, x1))
length11(x0)
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
↳ QTRS
↳ Non-Overlap Check
↳ QTRS
↳ DependencyPairsProof
↳ QDP
↳ DependencyGraphProof
Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:
LENGTH1(cons2(X, Y)) -> LENGTH11(Y)
LENGTH11(X) -> LENGTH1(X)
FROM1(X) -> FROM1(s1(X))
The TRS R consists of the following rules:
from1(X) -> cons2(X, from1(s1(X)))
length1(nil) -> 0
length1(cons2(X, Y)) -> s1(length11(Y))
length11(X) -> length1(X)
The set Q consists of the following terms:
from1(x0)
length1(nil)
length1(cons2(x0, x1))
length11(x0)
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
The approximation of the Dependency Graph contains 2 SCCs.
↳ QTRS
↳ Non-Overlap Check
↳ QTRS
↳ DependencyPairsProof
↳ QDP
↳ DependencyGraphProof
↳ AND
↳ QDP
↳ QDPAfsSolverProof
↳ QDP
Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:
LENGTH1(cons2(X, Y)) -> LENGTH11(Y)
LENGTH11(X) -> LENGTH1(X)
The TRS R consists of the following rules:
from1(X) -> cons2(X, from1(s1(X)))
length1(nil) -> 0
length1(cons2(X, Y)) -> s1(length11(Y))
length11(X) -> length1(X)
The set Q consists of the following terms:
from1(x0)
length1(nil)
length1(cons2(x0, x1))
length11(x0)
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
By using an argument filtering and a montonic ordering, at least one Dependency Pair of this SCC can be strictly oriented.
LENGTH1(cons2(X, Y)) -> LENGTH11(Y)
Used argument filtering: LENGTH1(x1) = x1
cons2(x1, x2) = cons1(x2)
LENGTH11(x1) = x1
Used ordering: Quasi Precedence:
trivial
↳ QTRS
↳ Non-Overlap Check
↳ QTRS
↳ DependencyPairsProof
↳ QDP
↳ DependencyGraphProof
↳ AND
↳ QDP
↳ QDPAfsSolverProof
↳ QDP
↳ DependencyGraphProof
↳ QDP
Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:
LENGTH11(X) -> LENGTH1(X)
The TRS R consists of the following rules:
from1(X) -> cons2(X, from1(s1(X)))
length1(nil) -> 0
length1(cons2(X, Y)) -> s1(length11(Y))
length11(X) -> length1(X)
The set Q consists of the following terms:
from1(x0)
length1(nil)
length1(cons2(x0, x1))
length11(x0)
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
The approximation of the Dependency Graph contains 0 SCCs with 1 less node.
↳ QTRS
↳ Non-Overlap Check
↳ QTRS
↳ DependencyPairsProof
↳ QDP
↳ DependencyGraphProof
↳ AND
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:
FROM1(X) -> FROM1(s1(X))
The TRS R consists of the following rules:
from1(X) -> cons2(X, from1(s1(X)))
length1(nil) -> 0
length1(cons2(X, Y)) -> s1(length11(Y))
length11(X) -> length1(X)
The set Q consists of the following terms:
from1(x0)
length1(nil)
length1(cons2(x0, x1))
length11(x0)
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.